Yahoo! SCOX Review

Message ID: 392866 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2006-07-24 18:26:09 Subject: is there really cause for gloating? Recs: 0 I'm glad the brook wells finally woke-up and gave IBM a very well deserved partial victory. And I'm glad to see scox's share price declining. But, I don't get all the "darl is getting reamed" and "scox is being slammed" bluster. To me, the sad bottom line looks like this: 1) wells does not give scox a slam-dunk victory everytime, but she does as much as she can. During the last hearing, I don't think she could have given scox a 100% victory without seriously risking an appeal from ibm. 2) Scox share price dropped to $0.56 the day darl took over - and that was on half as many shares as scox now has. Scox's market cap is still nearly 10X what is was pre-scam. 3) Darl is not hurting, neither is Yarro, and it's likely that no harm, of any kind, will come to either. This scam has been a windfall for ...

Message ID: 387834 Posted By: freecode_99 Posted On: 2006-07-06 19:53:00 Subject: One BIG lie Recs: 25 The one big lie that is ofen repeated here is that UNIX Business is shrinking. No, it's not. SCOX UNIX business is going away, but UNIX will live on without them. Just a fact for those wondering. Ask the Open Group, IBM, HP, SUN or anyone with a real UNIX business (not SCOX - they are a sham of a scam). Their businesses are not chump change like SCOX (really Caldera wearing a SCO suit - a SCO lawsuit to be precise - that is rather moldy and worn-out, but they keep claiming it is brand-new and a prize-winner). I think people should not be fooled into thinking that UNIX is dead - it simply isn't. What is dead is the SCOX lawsuit idea that UNIX is dead. UNIX outclasses Windows by miles. Anyone who runs servers knows that. Linux and UNIX are more aligned in business than anything (except for SCOX - who are aligned with the wingnut brigade and about as much a par...

Message ID: 381266 Posted By: panglozz Subject: Re: RFC: Nymshifting SSM asks: >>For what purpose does stats post under both the stats nym and the panglozz nym?? Seriously. Why do that?<< "stats" was a very confining persona. I expressed my discomfort with this very early in my first "usenet" style posting career (May 2004), when Al. P. questioned missing sources for a post on the Bert Young relationship with the March First bankruptcy. I felt recently that "stats" had become an "issue". So it was easier to send him off to a well deserved rest, than try and solve whatever the issue might be. Of course now, Panglozz has created a "stats shifting" issue-- further proof of just how stupid stats can be. This Yahoo! SCOX Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution under the following license: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0. See also https://yahooscoxreview.blogspot.com/2006/06/rfc-nymshifting....

Message ID: 381130 Posted By: panglozz Subject: RFC: Nymshifting I'm getting dinged by DDT for nymshifting. Is this a hanging offense? Obviously DDT is cycling through several attacks: SEC/kook letter, nym-shifting, failure to return library books***. I have noticed a more than a bit of overt hostility between the given name crowd, and the nymshifters. For instance, an anonymous poster (insert irony here) followed me around Groklaw linking back to Y! crossposts. I'd like to hear from the "who-I-am-and-proud-of-it wing" on whether they hold grudges of the nymshifters. ***my own sarcastic attack, though no one followed up on the straight man jest. This Yahoo! SCOX Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution under the following license: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0. See also https://yahooscoxreview.blogspot.com/2006/06/re-rfc-nymshifting.html

Message ID: 380377 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2006-06-14 09:10:00 Subject: SCOX OWNS NOTHING, KILLS ITSELF Recs: 13 Scox is, at best, about 1% of msft's ongoing FUD campaign against Linux. At least, scox was that, at one point. Now scox may not even be that much. IBM, Novell, Red Hat, Chrysler, and AutoZone; we're not looking for a fight from scox. In each case, scox either initiated a bogus lawsuits, or brought on the lawsuits by blatant Lanham Act Violations. Nobdoy "screwed" scox. Msft just paid scox to file lawsuits in order to create a perceived legal cloud over Linux. The effectiveness of msft's little scam (to kill the competition via massive abuse of the US legal system) is debatable. Don't take my word for it, it's all been well documented. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board us...

Message ID: 376230 Posted By: jcauseyfd Posted On: 2006-05-30 10:35:00 Subject: Stock performance Recs: 7 Hmm, was just going through some old stuff and found my old "Grokfund" which was composed of stocks involved in the SCO-scam. The portfolio was created in August 2004 and assumed that I purchased equal amounts (roughly $10,000) of each company adding up to a $50k investment and then a $2,000 investment in SCOX. I think it had something to do with some debate at the time about SCOX being no more than 4% of a portfolio. The results so far show: Autozone (AZO) up 15.48% Daimler-Chrysler (DCX) up 24.22% IBM (IBM) down 5.38% Novell (NOVL) up 17.86% Red Hat (RHAT) up 79.97% The SCO Group (SCOX) up 10.86% JCausey ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "jcauseyfd" under the following license: Licens...