Yahoo! SCOX Review

Message ID: 87443 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2004-01-30 10:40:00 Subject: no insider selling = no volume Recs: 0 and not much price movement. That is how it looks to me. By insider, I mean anybody who is in on the scam: royce, canopy, etc. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 86603 Posted By: preadapted Posted On: 2004-01-28 15:16:00 Subject: More new words Recs: 5 There seems to be some rust or SCOrrosion on your shit shovel there, Darly boy... I wonder if there will be any SCOrrupt politicians buying into Darly's little scam letter to SCOngress. Their whole SCOntemptible scam and litigation efforts will soon end up headed out to sea on a stinkin' garbage SCOw. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "preadapted" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

Message ID: 86095 Posted By: manyhats23 Posted On: 2004-01-27 13:57:00 Subject: *yawn* .... Has the Hammer Dropped Yet? Recs: 4 Rating: 0 Raters: 0 not yet ..... 42,000 shares traded. *yawn* --m waiting for this stock scam to crash ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "manyhats23" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 85860 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2004-01-27 08:07:00 Subject: pop-media doesn't get it Recs: 3 I don't know if pop-media understands why so many people are pissed at scox. Of course, scox is trying to spin it to look like linux users are just a bunch of napster thieves, who are crying about being forced to pay scox what is due to scox. Some pop-media clowns think linux users are mad at ibm being sued. For the record: if anybody has grounds to sue ibm; they can sue ibm all they want, for what I care. For a least a decade now, msft has been putting the brakes on technology in order for msft to preserve it's monopoly. God only knows how many innovative small businesses have been ruined by msft oppression. I've been sick of it for a while now. Msft can easily dismiss the DOJ with a few politcal "contributions." Now this jackass in business suit, mcbride, is feverishly working to gut a promissing technology, because it helps hi...

Message ID: 85053 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2004-01-23 16:49:00 Subject: United Linux is DEAD!!! SCO Killed It! Recs: 8 YOU BASTARDS!!!! zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5146194.html QUOTE Most prominently, one of its founding members, the SCO Group--previously Caldera International--has abandoned its Linux software business in favor of suing IBM and demanding that Linux users pay it based on its assertion that the open-source operating system is tainted with SCO's Unix intellectual property...But SCO refused to resign from UnitedLinux. "As long as they remained a member, it remained impossible for us to begin new projects," Hunter said. ENDQUOTE HOW, praytell, is SCUMX still advertising a dead product? Illegally, of course, to move their stock scam forward. k ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user ...

Message ID: 84738 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2004-01-22 23:14:00 Subject: Price manipulation all along? Recs: 6 Of course the IPO was a scam. And, of course, there has been a lot of manipulation for the last several months. But, I don't think the price was manipulated up, when the share price was under $2. I don't think the recent price manipulation started until August. Remember the first time that novl questioned the copyright ownership? Scox dropped from $8 to $6 right away, that's a fairly normal share price movement. After SCOforum was when really weird price movement started. After scox embarassed themselves with the code showing; scox went up 50% in the next three sessions - price has defied gravity ever since. I think was when DB stepped in. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd...

Message ID: 84529 Posted By: manyhats23 Posted On: 2004-01-22 13:13:00 Subject: One Company's Response to SCO Recs: 20 From Slashdot: slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/22/1724207 And the response letter: www.gavinroy.com/~gavinr/SCO%20Response.pdf "Pssst! Hey Darl! Everyone's on to your stock scam!" --m ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "manyhats23" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 84267 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2004-01-21 22:27:00 Subject: Another lie from SCUMX!!! Recs: 5 In the pr newswire "quote" from the criminal idiot hyper-shill, Blake Stowell: "SCO contends documents from its 1995 transaction with Novell "make it clear copyrights to Unix did transfer. But Novell continues to say they kept those copyrights," Stowell said. Legal action is needed "to help people sort this out." Again, a lie. SCO here was "the Santa Cruz Operation" not Caldera/CALD. SCOX is not SCO, the Santa Cruz Operation. That was SCO. SCOX is variously known as "the SCO Group" and still officially known as "Caldera International" on the NASDAQ. At least NASDAQ isn't so crooked as to allow these fraudsters to appropriate the stock symbol "SCO" from the Santa Cruz Operation in order to defraud and further steal from investors and retail players on the NASDAQ exchange and ...

Message ID: 81184 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2004-01-14 22:34:00 Subject: A Source for the Well-Informed Investor Recs: 3 groklaw.net... ...unless you want to be numbered among the Greater Fools, that is. But stay away, if you REALLY want to plkay it smart. This is only a stock scam. See: http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=5y&s=SCOX&l=off&z=l&q=l&c=IBM%2CRHAT%2Cnovl&c=%5 EDJI The future is wholly contained in the past, especially with THIS criminally-promoted stock and the accompanying scam that has lasted since the pre-IPO roadshow of Caldera, the precursor to SCOX. k ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "korbomite" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 80270 Posted By: heimdal31 Posted On: 2004-01-13 12:15:00 Subject: Novell threatens to release all Recs: 22 Still looking at those letters. http://www.novell.com/licensing/indemnity/pdf/10_7_03_n-sco_tla.pdf In one of three dated October 7, 2003 from Novell to SCO, Novell specifically addresses SCO's threats to license to Linux end users. Novell then goes on to quote contract language that allows Novell to license UNIX and UnixWare to its customers with some restrictions. Novell then goes on to point out (as we have done here in the past) that the Caldera purchase of the Unix rights activates the "Change of Control" clause of the agreement, which removes those limited restrictions on Novell. Novell again mentions the threats against Linux users and threatens to exercise its rights. There is no direct linking that if SCO doesn't back down, Novell may open source everything it can, but the threat is certainly implied. If something like...

Message ID: 79686 Posted By: crunchie812 Subject: And my email.... Thank You: An ACLU For Linux From: Greg T Hill <greghill@terranova.net>  (Courts of Chaos) To: dackman@forbes.net Date: Today 01:09:30 pm I would like to congratulate you on a fair and balanced article on the SCO vs IBM/Linux issue.  Your article is a distinct cut above the work which has been previously published in Forbes on this subject.   There is a great deal of rage and frustration in the Open Source community over the coverage which SCO has recieved in many major media outlets, which amount to little more than a repackaging of SCO press releases. Doubtless you will recieve virulent emails from some hotheads for any omissions and percieved errors of fact. Your article is almost unique in that it mentions that IBM is countersuing for copyright and  patent violations.   Other points of interest in the coverage in general is that SCO's claim to be the owner of the Unix Operatin...

Message ID: 79250 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2004-01-10 01:30:00 Subject: Interesting message on SCO ML Recs: 11 groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&group=comp.unix.sco.misc&selm=e-ydnbg5cPsTi2aiRVn-jQ%40comcast.com especially this part: QUOTE: A company who produces medical software that I partner with is abandoning future development for the SCO platform in favor of Redhat Linux. ENDQUOTE So I am NOT the only one seeing this out there in the real world, and there are MANY former SCO ISVs (Independent Software Vendors-THE #1 driving force for ANY viable O/S...PERIOD!!!!- deserting for *GASP!* Red Hat Linux, even now. Any SCO ISVs wanna come foreward and tell us why you support this criminal enterprise (SCO) with your efforts? Let's see how many SCO ISVs come forward in their defense...remember,folks, the media watches this board! My bet is that we won't see a single reputable and confirmable post from a SCOX ISP ev...

Message ID: 79020 Posted By: crunchie812 Posted On: 2004-01-09 11:22:00 Subject: SCOX: Market doesn't care (.) Recs: 9 The volume of trading in SCOX is 1% of the volume of RHAT. Apparently, the market really doesn't give a crap one way or the other about this bush league stock scam. Nobody wants to play. At this point it is the institutionals against the insiders, with the public staying away in droves. Yes Darl, despite your press clippings, you are irrelevant. The only thing you press clippings represent is the volume of evidence you have provided against yourself for lanham Act violations. Way to go. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "crunchie812" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 78299 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2004-01-07 08:10:00 Subject: scox was not a bargin at $1.00 a share Recs: 3 A year ago, when scox was $1 a share, scox was a company that had never been profitable. Quite the opposite, scox had been gushing red ink since the day of it's bogus IPO. That IPO is still under investigation for fraud. Furthermore, there was not any reason to think scox ever would be profitable. Scox's core product, UnixWare, was far inferior to Linux in performance and features, and far more expensive. The only reason that scox ever had a profitable quarter was because of huge, one time, fud donations from msft and sunw. Even with those donations, scox had an unprofitable Q4. Scox core business has decreased substantially since scox was $1.00. The scox phenominon was scam ochestrated by the insiders, for the insiders. If you want those sort of pofits, you have to be an insider, realistically there is no other way. So if you want wa...

Message ID: 77454 Posted By: freecode_99 Posted On: 2004-01-04 13:21:00 Subject: Still just a scam Recs: 0 Nothing has changed significantly. The new claims will be torn asunder by their own words, and they will fail in this effort too. I am only suprised the pumper trolls keep showing up at all. There is something to be said for a lack of character as to worship villainy. The public sees through the game - it is only a matter of time before one of the conspirators cracks when caught in the noose. So, if you are a Strong Buy person - good luck with that. You will receive what is coming in due time. I have faith that Justice shall prevail, no matter what it takes. That means this bag of hot air will come crashing back to Earth in flames. That end was written by the executives, and they chose their course. I for one, will never acquiesce to these tards. It isn't in my nature. Anyone who does, simply lacks the backbone necessary to claim themselves a man. Honor is...

Message ID: 77391 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2004-01-03 13:43:00 Subject: Cringeley's SCUMX Predictions Recs: 1 ...as reported in /. and at the Cringeley site at: www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20040101.html QUOTE 5) The SCO debacle has created a crisis within the Linux community. They pretend that it hasn't, but it has. This will come to a head in 2004 with either the development of a new organizational structure for Linux or the start of its demise. Linux has to grow or die, and the direction it takes will be determined in 2004. 6) As for SCO, they'll continue to make noise until the middle of the year, at which point the legal case will implode and the company will give up. By that time, the company executives, insiders, and major investors will have all sold their positions at a handsome profit. This was never more than a stock scam, pushing the price of SCO shares up by more than 15 times. The clever part is how they used a legal case to...