Yahoo! SCOX Review

Message ID: 307228 Posted By: crunchie812 Posted On: 2005-09-28 09:51:00 Subject: Attn: Biff Recs: 23 Most of us on this board really don't care whether or not Caldera/the SCOG owns the Unix copyrights. We don't care whether or not those copyrights are upheld or invalidated. We don't care whether or not IBM or Novell get a black eye in court. What really got us going is the slander and libel by McBride, Yarro, and Sontag, and their motley crew of supporters, against Linux and F/OSS, and the blatant stock scam based on that libel and slander. What we are interested in is progress in the Lanham Act violations portion of the IBM case. We want to see the Red Hat case go forward. And we want action from the SEC. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "crunchie812" under the following license: License:  CC A...

Message ID: 300951 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-09-09 16:02:00 Subject: Scox will get more discovery/delay Recs: 5 Scox is asking for discovy. Of couse scox will get it. Scox will get more delay also. I guess these judges work scox, or maybe msft. Scox *always* gets what they want. Scox says "jump" and these judges are hanging from the rafters. Forget this scam going to trial in 2007. Apparently, that is not what msft/scox wants. If the judge takes a stand, msft will have that judge removed. I don't know how msft does it, but they alway do. Corruption is getting deep in here. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------