Yahoo! SCOX Review

Message ID: 381266 Posted By: panglozz Subject: Re: RFC: Nymshifting SSM asks: >>For what purpose does stats post under both the stats nym and the panglozz nym?? Seriously. Why do that?<< "stats" was a very confining persona. I expressed my discomfort with this very early in my first "usenet" style posting career (May 2004), when Al. P. questioned missing sources for a post on the Bert Young relationship with the March First bankruptcy. I felt recently that "stats" had become an "issue". So it was easier to send him off to a well deserved rest, than try and solve whatever the issue might be. Of course now, Panglozz has created a "stats shifting" issue-- further proof of just how stupid stats can be. This Yahoo! SCOX Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution under the following license: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0. See also https://yahooscoxreview.blogspot.com/2006/06/rfc-nymshifting....

Message ID: 381130 Posted By: panglozz Subject: RFC: Nymshifting I'm getting dinged by DDT for nymshifting. Is this a hanging offense? Obviously DDT is cycling through several attacks: SEC/kook letter, nym-shifting, failure to return library books***. I have noticed a more than a bit of overt hostility between the given name crowd, and the nymshifters. For instance, an anonymous poster (insert irony here) followed me around Groklaw linking back to Y! crossposts. I'd like to hear from the "who-I-am-and-proud-of-it wing" on whether they hold grudges of the nymshifters. ***my own sarcastic attack, though no one followed up on the straight man jest. This Yahoo! SCOX Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution under the following license: CCL Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0. See also https://yahooscoxreview.blogspot.com/2006/06/re-rfc-nymshifting.html

Message ID: 380377 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2006-06-14 09:10:00 Subject: SCOX OWNS NOTHING, KILLS ITSELF Recs: 13 Scox is, at best, about 1% of msft's ongoing FUD campaign against Linux. At least, scox was that, at one point. Now scox may not even be that much. IBM, Novell, Red Hat, Chrysler, and AutoZone; we're not looking for a fight from scox. In each case, scox either initiated a bogus lawsuits, or brought on the lawsuits by blatant Lanham Act Violations. Nobdoy "screwed" scox. Msft just paid scox to file lawsuits in order to create a perceived legal cloud over Linux. The effectiveness of msft's little scam (to kill the competition via massive abuse of the US legal system) is debatable. Don't take my word for it, it's all been well documented. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board us...