annielinux has no credibility
Message ID: 219295
Posted By: saltydogmn
Posted On: 2005-01-01 17:26:00
Subject: annielinux has no credibility
Recs: 7
I'll try to dissect your comeback post as succinctly as I can, point by point;
"...sent a letter to the SEC without doing any due diligence..."
My "due diligence" was looking at the top pro-SCO posters - you were one of them. As I said before, no one with a functioning cortex could possibly be pro-SCO, without being a part of the scam, or an enemy of F/OSS, or maybe just plain stupid. Take your pick.
"...as I said last year, I am a harmless troll..."
I guess I missed that posting. Let me know if ledite, qnc, biff, or the other like-minded village idiots have made the same admission somewhere, because I haven't seen theirs, either.
"I was simply here to make you people think, picking different sides to argue a point..."
Argue WHAT point?!? That there are as yet undiscovered tribes, deep in the heart of the Peruvian jungle, that even know this whole SCOX fiasco is nothing but a scam, with Microsoft behind it? There's no different sides, either; A group of unethical people, financed by another group of very wealthy, but unethical, as well as convicted monopolists, are trying to keep something (Linux) from making their existence on this Earth short-lived. They will stop at nothing to achieve their goals. It's well documented, and it has got to stop. I don't care how, either.
"...and have not posted at or read the SCOX board in almost a year..."
This part has me really wondering if you are who you say you are. I thought Yahoo deleted ID's if they were inactive for a certain length of time; it's how I managed to snag the bootihound nick. If that's the case, anything you say is irrelevant. On the other hand, if you really are the old annielinux, who hasn't even read the board in almost a year, how did you find out there was a post about you? I know first hand that the Yahoo search function leaves much to be desired. Unless one of your troll buddies filled you in on the message, which I see as quite possible, except you say you have no interest in SCOX... puzzling.
"Your SEC letter has no credibility, and countersuits are what you should now be thinking about."
I never said anything about "credibility". If the SEC decides to check this out, anyone who really has nothing to worry about will be just fine. Others, like qnc, who still hasn't wiped the froth from his monitor after he popped a bolt at me earlier this week, may be in line for a perp walk, and some time at the Greybar Motel, and they are the ones spewing their threats of countersuits. Like you just did. Wouldn't I have to file one first?
I've got nothing to worry about here; except I'm getting sick and tired of thisshit taking way too long. Kill this bastard company off now, damn it.
------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "saltydogmn"
under the following license:
License: CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0
------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: saltydogmn
Posted On: 2005-01-01 17:26:00
Subject: annielinux has no credibility
Recs: 7
I'll try to dissect your comeback post as succinctly as I can, point by point;
"...sent a letter to the SEC without doing any due diligence..."
My "due diligence" was looking at the top pro-SCO posters - you were one of them. As I said before, no one with a functioning cortex could possibly be pro-SCO, without being a part of the scam, or an enemy of F/OSS, or maybe just plain stupid. Take your pick.
"...as I said last year, I am a harmless troll..."
I guess I missed that posting. Let me know if ledite, qnc, biff, or the other like-minded village idiots have made the same admission somewhere, because I haven't seen theirs, either.
"I was simply here to make you people think, picking different sides to argue a point..."
Argue WHAT point?!? That there are as yet undiscovered tribes, deep in the heart of the Peruvian jungle, that even know this whole SCOX fiasco is nothing but a scam, with Microsoft behind it? There's no different sides, either; A group of unethical people, financed by another group of very wealthy, but unethical, as well as convicted monopolists, are trying to keep something (Linux) from making their existence on this Earth short-lived. They will stop at nothing to achieve their goals. It's well documented, and it has got to stop. I don't care how, either.
"...and have not posted at or read the SCOX board in almost a year..."
This part has me really wondering if you are who you say you are. I thought Yahoo deleted ID's if they were inactive for a certain length of time; it's how I managed to snag the bootihound nick. If that's the case, anything you say is irrelevant. On the other hand, if you really are the old annielinux, who hasn't even read the board in almost a year, how did you find out there was a post about you? I know first hand that the Yahoo search function leaves much to be desired. Unless one of your troll buddies filled you in on the message, which I see as quite possible, except you say you have no interest in SCOX... puzzling.
"Your SEC letter has no credibility, and countersuits are what you should now be thinking about."
I never said anything about "credibility". If the SEC decides to check this out, anyone who really has nothing to worry about will be just fine. Others, like qnc, who still hasn't wiped the froth from his monitor after he popped a bolt at me earlier this week, may be in line for a perp walk, and some time at the Greybar Motel, and they are the ones spewing their threats of countersuits. Like you just did. Wouldn't I have to file one first?
I've got nothing to worry about here; except I'm getting sick and tired of this
------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "saltydogmn"
under the following license:
License: CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0
------------------------------------------------------------