Once more, for the record... walterbyrd
Message ID: 233915
Posted By: karl_w_lewis
Posted On: 2005-02-09 15:06:00
Subject: Once more, for the record... walterbyrd
Recs: 21
Walterbyrd,
For the record sir, and all joking aside, you were right from the beginning about the judiciary in Utah. I was wrong.
This ruling is a pile of steaming stuff. It wn't get the judge in trouble because he's done nothing, except, as you have argued all along: doing nothing *is* favoring this meaningless lawsuit and the thieving whores who brought it; it permits them to continue their stock scam unabated.
KWL
------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user
"karl_w_lewis" under the following license:
License: CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0
------------------------------------------------------------
Posted By: karl_w_lewis
Posted On: 2005-02-09 15:06:00
Subject: Once more, for the record... walterbyrd
Recs: 21
Walterbyrd,
For the record sir, and all joking aside, you were right from the beginning about the judiciary in Utah. I was wrong.
This ruling is a pile of steaming stuff. It wn't get the judge in trouble because he's done nothing, except, as you have argued all along: doing nothing *is* favoring this meaningless lawsuit and the thieving whores who brought it; it permits them to continue their stock scam unabated.
KWL
------------------------------------------------------------
The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for
copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user
"karl_w_lewis" under the following license:
License: CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0
------------------------------------------------------------