Yahoo! SCOX Review

Message ID: 174045 Posted By: stats_for_all Posted On: 2004-08-30 10:22:00 Subject: WDCO == Wilson-Davis Recs: 28 WDCO has been at the top of the OTCBB bid list all morning, six cents higher than the next active bid. Wilson-Davis Company, is a local Salt Lake City brokerage. Wilson-Davis Company has a long SEC history for involvement in pump and dump scams with Canadian Penny stocks. For Instance see news report of the WAMEX indictment: siliconinvestor<dot>com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=19258915 ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "stats_for_all" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 173396 Posted By: freecode_99 Posted On: 2004-08-27 17:02:00 Subject: Remember: it doesn't change the facts Recs: 2 The stock may rise (a little) as a pre-earnings pump. Most stocks do. Even if they managed to pull off any profit, it won't be an indicator of success at anything, other than holding onto customers and squeezing under threat. I predict that they will inflate the SCO SCam licenses by tying them to UNIX licenses. That is the only way other than working with a TICC-backed company that I can see them pulling off any revenue. If it is Bizland - they're busted, cause it is a Cohen/Royce backed company and we all know that. That would be an obvious wookie. freecode ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "freecode_99" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercia...

Message ID: 171919 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2004-08-25 08:09:00 Subject: why IBM lawyers beat scox lawyers Recs: 19 In all fairness, scox has spared little expense on legal fees, scox has hired some big guns. But when we comapare the filings of the two legal teams, it's nothing but a joke. I actually find myself snickering. My guesses: 1) Scox legal teams don't have much to work with. They don't have the facts, or the law on their side. A bunch of moron big-mouth execs can't be helping matters. 2) IBM lawyers are in for the long haul, they expect to working for IBM years from now. Scox lawyers are just there for a quick cash grab. Loyalty is not an issue with scox lawyers. 3) Scox lawyers just don't have their heart in it. They secretly hate scox, they know it's all a scam, they know scox is going to lose. Hard to be enthusiastic. 4) Scox lawyers know that the best they can do is obfuscate and delay. That, and keeping the sco...

Message ID: 170692 Posted By: jgabriel66 Posted On: 2004-08-22 20:15:00 Subject: Darl Planned This Scam From Start Recs: 14 svarshachik: "One fine morning, a few years ago, Darl woke up and found himself to be the CEO of Caldera. Darl's specialty is suing people. ... Caldera was bleeding cash, so Darl was looking for someone to sue. Then, at some point later, someone at Caldera came running to Darl -- look, I found the same code in Linux and Unixware!" Everything we've seen in Darl's statements (reading between the lines) and SCO's association with BSF, indicates that Ralph & Darl were intending something like this from the get-go, and that Darl was hired specifically for that purpose. It probably can't be *proved*, but Darl's said in interviews that his first step in coming on board was to review SCO's assets and identify unexploited, profitable opportunities. The fact that negotiations and consultation with BSF was alread...

Message ID: 163820 Posted By: karl_w_lewis Posted On: 2004-08-05 20:01:00 Subject: Game off Recs: 10 Okay. I apologize to the board for wasting so much bandwidth on buttery_poppy_cock, (whatever). It has been fun, though. Some of you folks are really clever. (And bitter. Wow!) I notice we now have a second paid troll trying to lure losers, (and their money), into this SCAM. I am deeply confused; you don't suppose anyone would be dumb enough to buy this stock based on that mumbo-jumbo posted here do you? How much do you suppose Darl pays these hacks? Do these Scam-artists know that all the posts here are archived in a searchable database? Shouldn't that frighten them? I won't be plonking these losers because I want to keep an eye on them, but I will try very very hard not to talk to them. KWL ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by t...

Message ID: 163646 Posted By: heimdal31 Posted On: 2004-08-05 14:55:00 Subject: Of Bounces and Forums Recs: 13 Last year's SCOForum occurred a little later in the month than this year's and was rife with many more contradictions than this years. Last year, SCO planned to show concrete examples of infringing code and those involved in the scam fully expected a huge bounce to come out of it. To their chagrin, by Tuesday morning their code samples had leaked and the community had torn it to shreds. I'm sure they expected a big fall. However, by Wednesday Cohen of the Royce Technology Fund had gone to work and Thursday the SCOForum price spike had begun. Lots of ironic contradictions in all of that. On Friday 15 Aug last year, the Fri before SCOForum, SCO closed at 10.30. On Thursday, the Cohen spike (see www.threenorth.com/cohen.html) began and SCO hit 12.66 on volume of 750K. The volume peaked the following Monday with over 1M shares and the price p...