Yahoo! SCOX Review

Message ID: 65718 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2003-11-25 19:10:00 Subject: GO4SCO: Challenge MET!!! You Liar. Recs: 7 Your challenge, in message # 65400 on this board was: >> Go ahead let the Zealot in you flame that.<< First, I am not a Zealot. I am but a simple hunter for the truth. I met your challenge and proved you again to be nothing but liar and a shill (and probably just a script-kiddie punk, too). Message #65400, you state: >> Hmmm, I never siad OpenSSL was GPL, I siad when the idea of using OpenSSL came up I shot it down. Regardless of whatever free license it used.<< and yet, in Message # 64167, you state: >> One of my techs came to me and wanted to use OpenSSL on a project. Management thought it was soo cool we could do this project cheaper. Until I explained the viral clause in the GPL and they had me run norton antivirus on our network to clean this thing out!<< Clearly implying, you thought OpenSSL...

Message ID: 64274 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2003-11-21 15:18:00 Subject: BAM!!!!! Recs: 0 The Street must know something about today's session we don't. Maybe EVERYONE finally twigged to the truth: this is a stock scam. k ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "korbomite" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 64104 Posted By: manyhats23 Posted On: 2003-11-21 11:51:00 Subject: The Shills Are Back Recs: 2 "annielinux" and "sco_sho_path" ... must be bad news a comin' Darl McBride isn't smart enough to run a stock scam, but Boies is. --m ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "manyhats23" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 63851 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2003-11-20 16:33:00 Subject: Net loss for the day Recs: 2 What a waste! Two days after the foot-bullet/FUD-A-THON in Lindon and Vegas...MUCH faster die-off of the FUD effects than after SCUMForum in August. Looks like Darl has lost his touch. Boies never had a touch, except one that's about to get him disbarred in Florida. Looks like the rest of the world has awakened to the truth: this is a stock scam. k ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "korbomite" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 63241 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2003-11-19 13:34:00 Subject: Groklaw is gonna be busy this week!!! Recs: 3 ...as the ONLY place, other than here that investors can find the truth about the SCUMX stock scam. GO PJ!!!! k ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "korbomite" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 63184 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2003-11-19 12:20:00 Subject: no case = no case Recs: 9 I don't care who's representing you. Besides, it's perfectly obvious that scox isn't going to trial to sue ibm. This entire thing is not crazy or stupid. If you look at it in terms of a stock scam, everything makes perfect sense. To me, the saddest part, is the abysmal ineptitude of the US justice system, and the US legal system. Sad, just pathetically sad. Even a bunch of losers like canopy/scox can make a dishonest fortune, and laugh all the way to the bank. Laugh at the US justice system, and with good reason. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ----------------------------------------------...

Message ID: 62627 Posted By: crunchie812 Posted On: 2003-11-18 10:57:00 Subject: Gnu/Linux:Gnu's Not Unix! Recs: 22 The base of the SuSE linux distribution is the Linux kernel and the GNU libraries and tools. For all potential suckers: GNU stands for Gnu's Not Unix. Get that? Not Unix. What part of Not Unix don't you understand? Canopy's spokesmodel Darl McBride, in his current acting role as CEO of a disintegrating software company turned litigant extradinaire, announces a lawsuit for competeing in the Unix business, by aquiring a software distributor of an operating system that is explicitly NOT UNIX! This is good news? The fact that SCO violated the terms of their agreement with Novell by not acting in accordance with Novell's instructions to desist in their claims to terminate IBM's Unix license, and are now announcing the intent to sue Novell, is not good news. In order to fuel another pump in the stock price, they have opened up y...

Message ID: 61086 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2003-11-13 15:03:00 Subject: This is a stock scam Recs: 0 ...and has been since the Caldera pre-IPO roadshows. On low volume, those in the employ and serving the interests of the Insiders and backers of this criminal company have bid the price back up to lure more Greater Fools in to take their money, too. The manipulation continues today and takes advantage of the greedy and stupid. Meanwhile, SCOX's attorneys perjure themselves and their clients... ...more evidence that the markets are rife with corruption...certainly the next target of Mr. Sptzer's teams should be stocks like this, trading like this and the whole of the NASDAQ. k ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "korbomite" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-Shar...

Message ID: 60925 Posted By: martin_lvnv Posted On: 2003-11-13 05:35:00 Subject: Cargo Cult Legal moves Recs: 14 So SCO decided to copy IBM and send out supoenas. So SCO sent one to Linus and RMS. What can they be thinking? Their lawyers are so clueless its like they pacific islanders in the grip of the cargo cult-- going through the motions without any understanding. SCOs thinking seems to be that if they mirror IBMs legal moves they will be successful. There is a difference between SCOs legal moves and IBMs. IBM supoenaed DB to find out what SCO showed and told them. This is directly related to IBMs claim that SCO is a stock scam and also directly related to IBM showing the judge they should win their motion to compel since SCO is showing evidence to everyone but not producing it in discovery for IBM. But what answers can SCO get from Linus and RMS? SCOs case is a contract action against IBM. It only matters what IBM did or didn't do. There is no way RMS had...

Message ID: 60062 Posted By: zarathustrius Posted On: 2003-11-10 16:46:00 Subject: Which scam is it? Recs: 20 was Re: How will execs profit? The more I look at this the more I am convinced it is not a simple insider stock scam. Granted, Canopy already pulled some significant $ out, but the execs can't bail bigtime without inviting unwanted scrutiny. They know the SEC is resource starved (and likely supported anyone running for office who would help keep it that way), but they also know that the SEC can't ignore blatant scams. I am becoming convinced that the conspiracy theorists advancing the anti-Linux FUD theory have a point. The financial gain by insiders (at least the overt gain by selling SCOX stock) cannot be the sum total of this story. I see only two plausible alternatives: 1) SCOX/McBride thought they could scare up a buyout from IBM and didn't think much beyond that. There is considerable evidence for this angle. 2) SCOX is a pawn played b...

Message ID: 59954 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2003-11-10 11:53:00 Subject: Down on above average volumes... Recs: 2 Good boy! Gets a cookie! 3000@16 1000 share ladders to 18.75 When will they ever learn... The paint and the play time may be over. SCOX may have run out of shills and energy to pump this pig. This is a stock scam and has been since the Caldera IPO. k ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "korbomite" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 59888 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2003-11-10 03:38:00 Subject: "Our complaint will now move... Recs: 6 ...to the discovery phase." Prophetic words from Red Hat CEO, Matthew Szulik, this past August. After what has gone down since, I thought it telling to revisit recent history. Consider the following: -Red Hat has moved forward in its aims to stop SCUMX from slandering and libelling the entirety of the FLOSS community - especially the GNU/GPL sub-community - and their corporate partners and allies. -HPQ and SUNW have shown their duplicitous hands, along with ORCL and CA and reaped the whirlwind because of it. -IBM is following the money and attempting to pierce the corporate veil all the way to the ultimate backers - the above mentioned traitorous "friends" of FLOSS and and perhaps to MSFT itself, to answer the question "What did you plan and when did you plan it?" -The disaster in Las Vegas. -The recent announcement...

Message ID: 59879 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2003-11-10 00:10:00 Subject: More Numbers and Purty Pitchers!!!! Recs: 0 Too BAD, Longs!!!! Stock Scam!!! SCOX is a stock scam that supports Jihadist terrorists, like al-Qu'aeda. finance.yahoo.com/q/ta?s=SCOX&t=3m&l=off&z=l&q=l&p=v&a=ss,p12,v,vm&c= Stupid, stupid longs...hear the feet of Cravath, the slither of Boies and Heise and the STOMP!!! of the marshalls as they kick in your door, sending you to Gitmo, next door to Ali... k ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "korbomite" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 59617 Posted By: martin_lvnv Posted On: 2003-11-08 02:29:00 Subject: Not for long < 15 million shares Recs: 1 You probably ought to mention that there are less than 15 million shares out right now, but by the time the PIPE converts, it will be considerably in excess of 15 million shares. Just that one deal involved printing about 3 million brand new shares. It pissed off at least one long who posted here when his ownership got diluted. And who can say if thats the last time a deal will be announced where SCO hands out a couple million shares or options, etc. Also SCO is already authorized to issue 45 million shares without even going back to the board to ask permission (as far as I know). And it has been freely running the share printing press printing shares for employee options, shares for SUNW as part of the deal where SUNW paid for a SCO license, shares for the Vultus deal, the PIPE etc. In fact, almost everything they announce involves printing shar...

Message ID: 59610 Posted By: martin_lvnv Posted On: 2003-11-08 02:08:00 Subject: Libel and Slander Recs: 2 < I hope they pursue some of the remaks on this board.> IANAL. Follow this at your own risk. Consult an attorney. Etc. Just because they don't like it, doesn't mean they can pursue it. First off, everyone is entitled to an opinion. So saying "I think is a stock scam" is never actionable since its just sharing your opinion. Next, truth is also a defense. For instance saying "It is definitely a stock scam" is completely protected if you can prove it actually is a stock scam (or they can't prove it isn't, or even if they don't want to take you to court since in discovery you can ask for evidence relating to whether it is or isn't a stock scam). Also as public figures, SCO has a much higher standard before getting damages. Even if you say something thats untruthful, they have to prove you had intentional malice. Fo...

Message ID: 59574 Posted By: crunchie812 Posted On: 2003-11-08 00:37:00 Subject: SCOX Lawyers Recs: 5 "The post-Enron world has given rise to a trendy legal specialty: the defense of companies accused of suspect accounting and insider self-dealing. At the top of the field is hot-shot New York attorney David Boies." http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/business/3543312.htm THE man for the job at SCOX. So what if he doesn't know IP law? It's a pump and dump stock scam. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "crunchie812" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 59269 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2003-11-07 04:11:00 Subject: Gee, Am I a Lawyer, now, too? Recs: 1 A quick link to a page that takes about 35 seconds to load from nntp over a 14.4K connection and answers ALL of SCOX's questions and, effectively PROVES their lies are just that: LIES...SCUMX LIES...and David Boies, as an officer of the Court and his entire firm should be DISBARRED for incompetence and perjury!!! Go to: comp.unix.questions and look for the UNIX FAQ. Here is a link that has been being posted since the birth of the Internet, and FAR longer than there has been a single commercial Linux distro: groups.google.com/groups?selm=unix-faq/faq/part6_1067683236%40rtfm.mit.edu&output=gplain It is updated on regular intervals. There are 8 parts. The SCOX company has been a stock scam since the Caldera IPO...it has just become more of a stock scam, making thte same people money. Investors will ALWAYS lose with this stock. The or...

Message ID: 58972 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2003-11-06 08:03:00 Subject: Will novl sue scox? Recs: 0 I sure would if I were novl. I can't imagine a company in a stronger position to win such a lawsuit. Novl knows everything about the ATT/BSD deal. Novl can truthfully claim that they are harmed by scox's extortion scam. My guess is: novl's suse purchase has been in the works for a long time. That may be the only reason that novl/suse hasn't filed a suit against scox already. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 58737 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2003-11-05 14:41:00 Subject: Flushing SCOX Recs: 2 ...down and down it goes... ...round and round it goes... ...and Darl wants to flush it AGAIN!!!! GOOODY!!! This is nothing but a stock scam, boys and girls. SCOX, Canopy and their backers are being currently pursued by the Attorney General of the State of New York...DB will go down first, followed by Royce and his backers and then right to SCOX and Canopy, folowed by MSFT, SUNW, HPQ and all their other backers - the secret ones, too. ...a stock scam, pure and simple, and the scammers are about to get caught. Keep talking, Darl!!! k ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "korbomite" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 -------------------------------------------...

Message ID: 58465 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2003-11-04 23:46:00 Subject: More observations on today's news: Recs: 12 First of all, from Groklaw, an especially cogent sub-discussion about the nature of War, Spitting in the Wind and Tugging on Superman's Cape: tinyurl.com/todo Especially this observation: QUOTE (groklaw.com) Novell also knows something that SCO cannot know. Novell knows what is in the sealed settlement between it, USL, and the Regents of the University of California. There has been a lot of speculation about what is in that document, and none of it is assumed to be good for SCO. It may well contain listings of code that appears in AT&T System V which AT&T stipulated to having been lifted from BSD without attribution. SCO could well believe that it has a registered copyright on code which also appears in that settlement as ©1980-something The Regents of the University of California. ENDQUOTE (groklaw.com) and then THESE analyses...

Message ID: 58460 Posted By: crunchie812 Posted On: 2003-11-04 23:17:00 Subject: Why Stock Go Up? No really.... Recs: 9 I don't get it. When DB first came out with the $45 target it was news and triggered a big run up in price. Or did it? The Baystar deal is announced immediately folowing. Coincidence? Not. Now that DB recommmendation was so hedged and waffled that it was hardly worth calling a recommendation, other than the totally unsupported $.38 earnings projection and the equally unsupported $45 target. Yet the price takes off, then drifts back down to below BayStar's $16.93 price, with dwindling volume. So today we get the Novell/SuSE/IBM news, which is somewhere between not good and totally disastrous for SCO, and we get Skiba reiterating the same unsupported target, which doesn't factor in the effects of the BayStar deal. And we get a $3.00 jump in price? I'm having a difficult time believing that either price jump was a reaction to the...

Message ID: 58046 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2003-11-03 23:12:00 Subject: SuSE CEO RE: SCO/TSG/SCOX Recs: 3 Richard Siebt, CEO of the privately-held SuSE Linux, AG responds to the FUD of SCUMX, in a letter to the Mystery Man here: www.orangecrate.com/article.php?sid=481 SuSE, by the way, for the longs and shills and voodoo kids here, is SCOX's primary partner in United Linux and a supporting plaintiff in SCOX's famous LinuxTAG loss in Germany. SuSE is QUOTE Since being established by university students in 1992 in Germany, SUSE LINUX has made a genuine quantum leap. Called the "Gesellschaft für Software- und Systementwicklung mbH", SUSE has grown to become one of the world's leading providers of the Open Source operating system, Linux. ENDQUOTE More on SuSE: QUOTE For instance, IBM Global Services and SUSE cooperate in offering worldwide support and maintenance services. Furthermore, SUSE has entered a global technology partnership wi...

Message ID: 58033 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2003-11-03 21:35:00 Subject: Why SCOX will lose Recs: 9 Because AT&T did. History repeats itself, as this gentleman proves, with some rather interesting links to UNIX history and some REAL background that many of you haven't seen before. Here's the link: www.orangecrate.com/article.php?sid=478 Follow and download the links for futher enlightenment, longs and shills and voodoo boys and girls...it will put a crimp in your joy, dudes and dudettes... ...of course, for all of the Crunchie Army of SCUMX Haters (and voodoo boys, we ARE an ARMY, large and ANGRY!!!!) consider this, from the Crate: QUOTE What we are faced with today is the SCO Group’s attempt to revisit the entire (ed. USL vs. BSDi) lawsuit again, and it seems to be based on faulty evidence (although they have yet to claim any specific evidence at all), poor due diligence and hoping that the memory of people involved in the long heritage of UN...