Yahoo! SCOX Review

Message ID: 392866 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2006-07-24 18:26:09 Subject: is there really cause for gloating? Recs: 0 I'm glad the brook wells finally woke-up and gave IBM a very well deserved partial victory. And I'm glad to see scox's share price declining. But, I don't get all the "darl is getting reamed" and "scox is being slammed" bluster. To me, the sad bottom line looks like this: 1) wells does not give scox a slam-dunk victory everytime, but she does as much as she can. During the last hearing, I don't think she could have given scox a 100% victory without seriously risking an appeal from ibm. 2) Scox share price dropped to $0.56 the day darl took over - and that was on half as many shares as scox now has. Scox's market cap is still nearly 10X what is was pre-scam. 3) Darl is not hurting, neither is Yarro, and it's likely that no harm, of any kind, will come to either. This scam has been a windfall for ...

Message ID: 380377 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2006-06-14 09:10:00 Subject: SCOX OWNS NOTHING, KILLS ITSELF Recs: 13 Scox is, at best, about 1% of msft's ongoing FUD campaign against Linux. At least, scox was that, at one point. Now scox may not even be that much. IBM, Novell, Red Hat, Chrysler, and AutoZone; we're not looking for a fight from scox. In each case, scox either initiated a bogus lawsuits, or brought on the lawsuits by blatant Lanham Act Violations. Nobdoy "screwed" scox. Msft just paid scox to file lawsuits in order to create a perceived legal cloud over Linux. The effectiveness of msft's little scam (to kill the competition via massive abuse of the US legal system) is debatable. Don't take my word for it, it's all been well documented. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board us...

Message ID: 353250 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2006-03-12 10:00:00 Subject: explain biff's position? Recs: 6 I never get a direct answer out of biff, so I won't try. I have never agreed with biff, but I used to understand what he was arguing. At least to the extent that I understood his basic premises. It seems there was a time when biff didn't flip-flop that often. Biff used to argue that novell owned the Unix copyrights, and that novell transferred those copyrights to scox. Then, on the novl board, biff argued that novl owned the copyrights, and novl still owns the copyrights. When I pointed out, to biff, that this contradicted his previous position about scox owning the copyrights. Biff claimed that scox both owned the copyrights, and did not own the copyrights. Now biff is flip-flopping again. Now biff is arguing that novl never owned the copyrights. Or is it that novl both owned them, and didn't own them? It's 07:53 here in denver. As ...

Message ID: 347116 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2006-02-17 15:19:00 Subject: why is a real exec working for scox? Recs: 1 darl and yarro are not real execs in my opinion. They are part of a bunch of byu frat boys who work together on various scams. Negris, on the other hand, seems like a real exec. Negris has been an exec for Oracle and IBM. Why does somebody like that want to work for scox? Maybe I've over-rated the guy? ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 300951 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-09-09 16:02:00 Subject: Scox will get more discovery/delay Recs: 5 Scox is asking for discovy. Of couse scox will get it. Scox will get more delay also. I guess these judges work scox, or maybe msft. Scox *always* gets what they want. Scox says "jump" and these judges are hanging from the rafters. Forget this scam going to trial in 2007. Apparently, that is not what msft/scox wants. If the judge takes a stand, msft will have that judge removed. I don't know how msft does it, but they alway do. Corruption is getting deep in here. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 270323 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-06-01 20:30:00 Subject: who's buying scosource? Recs: 2 Everybody knows it's a scam. I know it's only $30K a quarter, but I very much doubt that even that $30K is from legitamite sales. Is msft still interested enough to throw scox a few bread crumbs? If scox refuses to tell anybody who is buying; how does anybody know that scox is selling any scosource? How do we know scox is taking the money the money out of R&D, or something? ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 266629 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-05-18 09:32:00 Subject: Yarro = another object lesson? Recs: 20 On the up side of Yarro scamming canopy; I think it's another example of what happens to anybody who does business with this crowd. Scox provides no value to anybody, and scox will sue you, or steal from you if they have half a chance. Msft = sued over dr-dos, also bad PR for financing, and didn't get much FUD value for their money. IBM = has lost millions in discovery, and legal fees so far. That's the price of having ever done business with scox. EV1 = lost business due to their participation in the scox scam. Sun = bad PR, didn't get much FUD value, millions spent. AutoZone = another bogus lawsuit, the price for doing business with scox. Chrysler = another bogus lawsuit, the price for doing business with scox. Scox resellers = having to provide more support, while scox cuts into their profits. Scox customers = crappy over...

Message ID: 265837 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-05-16 09:42:00 Subject: Biggest winner in the scox scam = BSF Recs: 6 BSF must be loving it, they have done so little, and recieved so much, and there is so much more to go. By the time it's said and done, how much msft money will BSF get? $40MM? $50MM. Sweet. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 260272 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-04-28 18:21:00 Subject: fatcitystate, this is the scox board Recs: 4 Who cares if some IBM employees are all pissy about this or that. Show me a major company where there are no employees with any gripes. For that matter, since you are all over the IBM board, how many IBM investors give a rats azz about scox? Most IBM employees, and investors, are only dimly aware of scox's existance. Scox is irrelevant. Scox is nothing except a penny-stock scam. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 258622 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-04-22 10:31:00 Subject: Sam's dep is BS, but makes sense Recs: 17 To me, it only makes sense that scox would want a depositon from IBM's CEO. It also only makes sense that IBM would not want to allow it. The entire scox-scam is about harassing IBM into a settlement and/or making the public believe that scox, at least, might harass IBM into a settlement. Not only is the deposition itself a harassment, but it could very easily lead to more harassments, and more delays. More delays means no accountability, which means yet more harassment. For example, Sam might say something that scox will claim requires further investigation, and discovery for memos, emails, other depositons, etc. Even demanding the deposition is a small success for scox. It makes it appear that scox is actually preparing a case. And IBM fighting the deposition can be spun to look like IBM has something to hide. -------------------------...

Message ID: 255758 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-04-14 15:19:00 Subject: Shattered Recs: 11 Don't you know the share price is going up, up, up, up, up! But to invest in this scam you must be nuts, nuts, nuts, nuts, nuts! You got an "E" on ticker symbol No profits around What a mess this scam's in tatters it's been shattered Darl's brain's been battered, splattered all over Lindon, Utah ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 255603 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-04-14 10:37:00 Subject: About Credibilty? Recs: 0 About Credibilty? The entire scoxe-scam is a shameful two year history of lie after lie, fraud after fraud, hoax after hoax. The following is from the first six months of the scoxe-scam. - Scoxe lies about suing Linus - Scoxe lies about suing RedHat - Scoxe lies about auditing AIX users - Scoxe flip-flops about being open to buyout - Scoxe lies about canceling IBM UNIX licence Scoxe price sky-rockets because, for weeks, everybody anticipates that Scoxe will cancel IBM's UNIX, thereby forcing IBM to settle with SCO. The day for Scoxe to get an immediate temporary injunction against IBM comes and goes. Scoxe does not even show up in court. But about 30 pop-media news articles come out proclaiming that Scoxe has canceled IBM's UNIX license. - Scoxe lies about owning C++ http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2877578,00.html ...

Message ID: 255495 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-04-14 00:35:00 Subject: Scoxe has over 20MM shares outstanding? Recs: 0 In fact, it may be nearly 21MM. If I understood those posting about the CC. That means that scoxe's market cap, is around $80MM right now. Not too shabby. Seems to me the scam is working very well. So why is scoxe cranking out more shares? Where are the shares going? ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 253591 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-04-08 10:32:00 Subject: What Val's death means, and doesn't Recs: 15 mean. There is, yet another, "oh please stop picking on Val" article on groklaw. The peculiar thing is: nobody is, or has been, picking on Val to begin with. Nobody on these message boards anyway. So why do they keep on and on, with all these requests? I get the feeling that the Noordas want all discussion, and especially all investigation, of the Noorda's involvement in the scoxe-scam, to stop. The Noorda's are trying to imply that anybody who believes that the Noordas could possibly be involved, is insensitive to Val's memory. IMO: Val's death doesn't prove anything about the Noorda's involvement - one way or the other. Val's death, of itself, does not automatically put the Noordas above suspecion. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Boar...

Message ID: 253124 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-04-06 11:40:00 Subject: Is scoxe fooling anybody? Recs: 0 Early on, I think scoxe may have had some people fooled. At this point, I'm not so sure. Certainly sophisticated investors know this is penny-stock junk. The funadmentals speak for themself, no history of profitability, horrid financial fundamentals, dwindling cash, no prospects of future profitability, outragous legal expenses, no viable products, delisting and bankruptcy are nearly certain, and scoxe is facing several credible lawsuits against them. Considering all that, the share price is amazingly high. The market cap is about 10X waht the market cap was before the scam. The only thing scoxe has is a lawsuit against IBM. Does anybody really beleive that lawsuit will payoff? ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo M...

Message ID: 251227 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-03-29 20:37:00 Subject: scoxe isn't fishing Recs: 6 What a joke. It's surprising that at this late date anybody would even discuss such an idea. Scoxe is simply trying to harrass some $$ out of IBM. Scoxe knows there isn't any infringing code, everybody knows it. Including the Utah judges. Scoxe has sysV, and scoxe has had 5 years of AIX, for well over a year now. There is no evidence that scoxe has even attempted to look for anything. None. I have posted serveral times about the numerous outright lies told by scoxe, and the slam-dunk evidence that this entire case is nothing but a total scam from day one. Even with the Utah judges on scoxe's side, and msft backing scoxe up every step of the way; scoxe is still losing. Scoxe simply has no case. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and dis...

Message ID: 243470 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-03-07 10:59:00 Subject: Lyons still far too kind to scoxe Recs: 0 Lyons portrays scoxe as incompetent, but not as dishonest. Also, in deference to overwhelming evidence to the contrary, Lyons also ridicules the idea that msft had a part in this. The obvious truth is that this has been a scam since the beginning, and msft is a huge part of the scam. At this point, how can Lyons possibly praise scoxe for anything other than being so-so scam artists? Lyons doesn't want to admit to a scam, so he calls scoxe a bunch of idiots. Even that is a turn around from what he was saying before. But Lyons is still putting a positive spin on the msft/scoxe scam. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonC...

Message ID: 239666 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-02-23 11:04:00 Subject: What a joke Recs: 0 $50MM in free money from baystar thanks to their buddies in redmond, and they're broke anyway. $31MM of that going to BSF - for what? Just so they could use a big law firm's name and look credible? What happend on Nov 2nd? Somebody say: "turn on the pumps to $4+, and hold it there" ? The stock flatlines on $4.05, autotrading trivial volume; then the huge volume spikes don't change the price even a fraction of a penny. I could use that chart for my most precise leveling work. Everybody knows it's a scam, involving heavy manipulation and back-room deals. Much of the scam has already been publically exposed. Yet, here we are. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the foll...

Message ID: 236033 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-02-14 15:25:00 Subject: Will scox go private? Recs: 7 Would it make sense for canopy to create some shell business, and have that business buy scox? Maybe not yet, but soon? A private business is much less open to public s cuntiny, and is far less regulated. I think it's evident by now that canopy/scox can't unload shares at some hugely inflated price. If canopy were to wait for scox to drop to $1 a share, canopy could buy the entire thing $20MM. Not really all that much. The scam is pretty much over, may be time for damage control. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

Message ID: 233435 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-02-08 12:07:00 Subject: will price go up when scox become scoxe Recs: 5 Still amazed by the resiience of the stock. I've seen a lot of small-caps completely crash on much less bad news - including heavily shorted small caps - with *far* better fundamentals. DYII was a small cap with great fundamentals, it went from $29 to $5, on a very minor suspected acconting discrepency. It happens all the time with small-caps. Except scox. 10-K filed late, CEO and CFO of parent company fired and sued for fraud, *horrible* fundamentals, core business never profitable, CEO caught in dozens of outlandish lies, awaiting a PSJ, and novell hearing which could complete ruin hope for future prospects, under-the-table scam deals exposed, heavily shorted, tons of bad press, clearly heading towards bankruptcy within a year. And so on, and so on. Yet, scox is over 30% in about two weeks. If it's being manipulated then they...