Yahoo! SCOX Review

Message ID: 241229 Posted By: saltydogmn Posted On: 2005-02-28 15:51:00 Subject: FCS, you magnificent bastard... Recs: 0 So, fat shittysteak... how are you, you great poof? We've missed your inane ramblings dearly. Tell us, oh disturbed one, exactly when is this stock scam company you pump for going to live up to its fiduciary responsibilities to its stockholders, and submit all of the late filings? You know, the ones those nice Federales in their government-issue thousand dollar suits keep waiting for? We're still waiting, you magnificent bastard. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "saltydogmn" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

Message ID: 240533 Posted By: higgins_jc Posted On: 2005-02-25 14:27:00 Subject: Reason why SCOsource not selling Recs: 43 I figured it was time to go buy a license, if SCO can keep IBM tied up for this long then it must be worth a read... :-) So off to SCO.com I go - on their short cut menu on the right hand side - I can't find any mention of the UNIX license that the told the judge they were selling. Only one that is listed as "SCO IP License for Linux"... Didn't they try tell IBM and the judge they weren't selling that ? Anyway - it will do.. so off to the page I go. http://www.sco.com/scosource/linuxlicense.html (that's for BIFF's benefit, because he never provides evidence ). So at the bottom of the page I'm told "The license is available immediately and can be purchased by credit card through our online store." and there is a "BUY NOW" button.. one click later and I'm presented with a series of steps (...

Message ID: 239666 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-02-23 11:04:00 Subject: What a joke Recs: 0 $50MM in free money from baystar thanks to their buddies in redmond, and they're broke anyway. $31MM of that going to BSF - for what? Just so they could use a big law firm's name and look credible? What happend on Nov 2nd? Somebody say: "turn on the pumps to $4+, and hold it there" ? The stock flatlines on $4.05, autotrading trivial volume; then the huge volume spikes don't change the price even a fraction of a penny. I could use that chart for my most precise leveling work. Everybody knows it's a scam, involving heavy manipulation and back-room deals. Much of the scam has already been publically exposed. Yet, here we are. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the foll...

Message ID: 239458 Posted By: atul666 Posted On: 2005-02-22 17:46:00 Subject: Still no 10-K on Edgar Recs: 0 Just checked again. If I'm not mistaken, their 7 calendar days are up. Since we haven't heard anything about the stock being delisted as of tomorrow, I assume this means they've filed an appeal with Nasdaq. I say "I assume" since the appeals process isn't public. Nasdaq's info page suggests that hearings usually take place around 45 days after an appeal is filed, so the appeal means SCO can go at least another 6 weeks or so without filing a 10-K. I expect they see this as a good thing, and they won't file a day earlier than they absolutely have to. Maybe they don't intend to ever file at all, and they're just stretching the process out so they can have one last go at scamming Nasdaq daytraders before making the jump to the pink sheets. I have a really funny feeling we won't see a 10-Q for Q1/05 either. It'...

Message ID: 238600 Posted By: span1sh1nqu1s1t1on Posted On: 2005-02-19 13:57:00 Subject: The Only Hope for Boies Recs: 6 I'm wondering if Boies could be disbarred and/or go to prison since he really got BSF deeply entangled with SCO and all its deals. Boies dodged getting disbarred in Florida, but this seems like it could be much worse if BSF knew there was no evidence and was a big part of both frivilous lawsuits and a stock scam. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "span1sh1nqu1s1t1on" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 238409 Posted By: notmrnice Posted On: 2005-02-18 17:45:00 Subject: The right thing to do Recs: 6 Sorry bout the typos etc.... The board of SCO, if they have any integrity as human beings and business men has no choice but: 1)Liquidate the company, to preserve the few remaining jobs not involved in the litigation. Fire the crooks, and let the engineers who have clean hands carry on the product. If they win ownership in the Novell case, donate the remaining SYSV copyrights in a BSD license. Openunix, etc, can live on to serice existing customer, and on the long term evolve into a service arm which helps small and medium businesses with Open source Enterprise Infrastructure. Leave a small portion of the remaining cash for this group. 2)Fire the entire executive team, as well as all employees involved in the licensing scam. File criminal suits of embezzlement against the main characters. File civil suits against th eembesslers to have compensatin re...

Message ID: 236392 Posted By: freecode_99 Posted On: 2005-02-15 14:19:00 Subject: No major decisions Recs: 13 Actually BIFF, you even sound lucid in that commentary. That's a major change in your online persona. Now, there is the fact that SCO is a SCAM is one ideation, but another is that SCO has engaged in a priori litigation, Lanham Act violations, possible Sherman Act violations (propping a monopoly up with the old amazing miracle-cross-license, just-in-time one-single-day before the cross-licensing arrangements were to be reviewed by the Settlement Court and Judge KKK), likely Sarbanes-Oxley violations under several sections for failures of notification and certification to the public and shareholders of certain risk factors in a timely fashion ( in these cases exceeeding 180 days), Possible FTC cartel rule violations and other facts which lead me to ask: Why should I listen to people who won't identify their evidence? Why should I believe that the SCO Gr...

Message ID: 236033 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-02-14 15:25:00 Subject: Will scox go private? Recs: 7 Would it make sense for canopy to create some shell business, and have that business buy scox? Maybe not yet, but soon? A private business is much less open to public s cuntiny, and is far less regulated. I think it's evident by now that canopy/scox can't unload shares at some hugely inflated price. If canopy were to wait for scox to drop to $1 a share, canopy could buy the entire thing $20MM. Not really all that much. The scam is pretty much over, may be time for damage control. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------ 

Message ID: 235611 Posted By: karl_w_lewis Posted On: 2005-02-13 07:38:00 Subject: Note to the SCO-Backers Recs: 25 'Kay, Biff, Butter, QNx, Ledite, and all your various nyms, (mini, suits, blue, rat, etc.), Listen up. (Really, this constitutes fair warning; it is posted in public.) This SCAM has drifted, slowly, slowly downhill since December of 2003. You remember, right? That was the first real court hearing on discovery. And the Conference call at the end of that month. From that time all of us who have been paying attention knew that this was going to work like a slow-motion train wreck - there's nothing that can be done to stop it, however long it takes, and, it is hard to look away. The thing about train wrecks that *you* need to understand, is that at the end, when metal meets metal, things start to happen very, very quickly. Pieces come flying off, whole, loaded cars get pitched way up in the air. The point is that individual pieces absor...

Message ID: 235577 Posted By: saltydogmn Posted On: 2005-02-12 18:37:00 Subject: SCO execs plan figured out! Recs: 4 It has been discussed at length in the past that several key figures involved in this illegal stock scam/FUD machine/pump and dump, might be posting on this very board, and I've finally figured out why. When they are brought up on charges, they will all plead not guilty, by reason of insanity. Based on the level of sanity in their posts, they will definitely get away with it, too. The evidence is overwhelming. It's the HaHa Hilton for all of them; ledite, biff, Q_N_C, you name it. They're all beyond hope, and the only solution for them is the psych ward. It's painfully obvious they are incapable of rehabilitation, so they will remain there for the rest of their lives. I don't feel sorry for them at all. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copyi...

Message ID: 235409 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2005-02-11 21:35:00 Subject: Lest we forget Recs: 30 That this is a stock scam and ONLY a stock scam, and ALWAYS has been: QUOTE At its SCO Forum event in August 2003, for example, the company said that using pattern recognition matching technology it had identified 1.1 million lines of code from 1,549 files of derivative works that had been donated to Linux by Unix licensees. ENDQUOTE and QUOTE The company has shied away from presenting that evidence in court, however, dropping misappropriation of trade secret claims against IBM in February 2004 in favor of claims that IBM breached a contract with SCO by contributing its own derivative Unix code to Linux. It has also repeatedly asked for more evidence from IBM, including every version of its AIX and Dynix Unix operating systems. ENDQUOTE Where are the "1.1 million lines of code from 1,549 files of derivative works that had been donated to Linux by Unix lic...

Message ID: 234899 Posted By: saltydogmn Posted On: 2005-02-10 23:37:00 Subject: Fark off, Ledite Recs: 3 You miserable, lying, worthless piece of sh!t. You, me, the guy down the street, Judge Kimball, Darl Mc Bride, and the guy at Great Clips (that cuts Darl's hair), know exactly what The SCO Group has told us; read this slowly, and carefully, luddite, old dork; THIS IS ---===<<< NOT >>>===--- A CASE ABOUT COPYRIGHTS, IT IS ABOUT CONTRACTS. Albeit the most drug-induced, incomprehensible, non-legal interpretation of contracts the world has ever seen. SCO's own legal team has admitted this, under oath, in at least one court of law. You know it all too well, and still, you manage not only to ignore what the side you support has admitted to the court, but you even tell bald-faced lies about it, in the oh-so-vain hope that someone - ANYONE - will be foolish enough to forego their financial common sense, and buy this worthless pig of a stoc...

Message ID: 234890 Posted By: bike4freedom2 Posted On: 2005-02-10 23:03:00 Subject: OT: So many strong sells must mean: Recs: 1 Is there another company's message board that is so overwhelmingly on the sell side? I checked a small company that almost nobody has herd of that has a average daily trading volume of just over 220,000 shares and a market cap of between 150M to 175M. I wanted to check a high tech company in the size range of SCOX. I looked back over the last two months and did not find a sell position listed (a lot of do not disclose). I also only had to check a few hundred messages, not the thousands or tens of thousands that this board gets. So is this just because SCOX is just a stock scam or is it that SCOX upset the geeks? If it is because it is a stock scam has anybody done a automatic message board checker looking for small company, low volume, high message board activity and strong sells to find other scams? ---------------------------------...

Message ID: 234325 Posted By: korbomite Posted On: 2005-02-10 03:19:00 Subject: Let us not forget: Recs: 0 The Intel subpoenas. BTAIM, however, I expect the clueless ANALysts and MOG-the- slut to play this up to the hilt, so expect it to possibly go as high as 7 - to - 10 in the next two weeks. When the Insider bailing becomes TOO obvious, the last nail will be driven, the Street will tire of this stock scam and SCO will finally die, as a company, but probably remain as a case, a memorial to the corrupt US "justice" system, as much as our new Attorney Generallissimo. I believe we will have to tolerate these shills only until the end of March, therefore, when the money runs out and the stock is delisted. Waiting for the LamLaw blog/opinion, as well as Moglen and the OSS Law. k ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board us...

Message ID: 233963 Posted By: saltydogmn Posted On: 2005-02-09 15:46:00 Subject: Commie_flusher is a liar, of course Recs: 8 Read it and weep, sh!t for brains. "Nevertheless, despite the vast disparity between SCO's public accusations and its actual evidence -- OR COMPLETE LACK THEREOF -- and the resulting temptation to grant IBM's motion, the court has determined that it would be premature to grant summary judgment on IBM's Tenth Counterclaim." ---The Honorable Dale A. Kimball, February 8th, 2005 This stock scam is almost over. Get 'em while they're hot. As for you, CC, I'd recommend doing some Pilates, or other stretching exercises, since it will be YOU doing most of the bending over. I hope you can touch your toes, because you're going to need to. P.S. Don't like my post? TELL IT TO THE JUDGE. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for c...

Message ID: 233915 Posted By: karl_w_lewis Posted On: 2005-02-09 15:06:00 Subject: Once more, for the record... walterbyrd Recs: 21 Walterbyrd, For the record sir, and all joking aside, you were right from the beginning about the judiciary in Utah. I was wrong. This ruling is a pile of steaming stuff. It wn't get the judge in trouble because he's done nothing, except, as you have argued all along: doing nothing *is* favoring this meaningless lawsuit and the thieving whores who brought it; it permits them to continue their stock scam unabated. KWL ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "karl_w_lewis" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------

Message ID: 233435 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-02-08 12:07:00 Subject: will price go up when scox become scoxe Recs: 5 Still amazed by the resiience of the stock. I've seen a lot of small-caps completely crash on much less bad news - including heavily shorted small caps - with *far* better fundamentals. DYII was a small cap with great fundamentals, it went from $29 to $5, on a very minor suspected acconting discrepency. It happens all the time with small-caps. Except scox. 10-K filed late, CEO and CFO of parent company fired and sued for fraud, *horrible* fundamentals, core business never profitable, CEO caught in dozens of outlandish lies, awaiting a PSJ, and novell hearing which could complete ruin hope for future prospects, under-the-table scam deals exposed, heavily shorted, tons of bad press, clearly heading towards bankruptcy within a year. And so on, and so on. Yet, scox is over 30% in about two weeks. If it's being manipulated then they...

Message ID: 232954 Posted By: rgriffith64 Posted On: 2005-02-07 10:13:00 Subject: No Base Value to SCO Recs: 5 SCO is not a growth stock. 1) SCO's legacy revenues are drying up 2) SCO is failing to establish itself in a new market 3) SCO's cash flow does not support survival for more than the 2 years required to get to a "win" in the lawsuit game. (5 years if you add in appeals). 4) did I address the possibility of not winning the legal game it is currently losing. 5) Last major inside investors bailed and continue to do so at face value losses. At this point the base value of SCO stock should be $0.00 The only reason for this not to be true is manipulation and market latency. Anyone joining the bubble is a fool. Those enticing others to join the bubble are the extortionists running the scam. "We have never been profitable" paraphrased from SCO 10K. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Y...

Message ID: 232432 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-02-04 16:47:00 Subject: Top Ten Scox-Scam Mysteries Recs: 8 I compiled all that I could find, and just came out to be ten. I think this is all of them: ------------- 10) Who's idea was it? Darl? Yarro? Msft? 9) Who is buying baystar's shares? 8) Is Eliott Spitzer investigating? 7) Is the SEC investigating? 6) Who is manipulating the share price? How are they doing it? And why? Note: other than baystar, no insiders are selling. 5) Did Yarro intend to create 'triggering events' from the Baystar deal. Did he succeed? 4) Who owns the 175419 bid? 3) Who is ledite and what is his true relationship in the grand scheme of things? 2) Who is BIFF and what is his . . . ? 1) Why does Royce continue to hold several hundred thousand shares? ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribut...

Message ID: 231649 Posted By: walterbyrd Posted On: 2005-02-02 16:37:00 Subject: when do we get the popcorn, and watch Recs: 3 scox crash and burn? Seems to me that for the last six months, scox either stays level, or goes up on bad news. Mid-Feb - maybe scox won't file and get delisted. March 3rd - happy 2nd aniversery scox scam! March 8th - Novell hearing, unless it's delayed again. Or has already been delayed again? I can't keep up. Mid-March - scox will be forced to reveal another abysmal quarter. I may have some of the dates wrong. ------------------------------------------------------------ The text of this Yahoo Message Board post has been licensed for copying and distribution by the Yahoo Message Board user "walterbyrd" under the following license: License:  CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike v2.0 ------------------------------------------------------------